header-logo header-logo

Brexit: Unified Patent Court could be history

07 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

The prospect of Brexit, should Article 50 be triggered, could put paid to the unitary patent scheme.

The Unified Patent Court, based on the Unified Patent Court Agreement signed by 25 EU Member States, is due to open for business in London next year.

It was to comprise a central court in Paris with sections in London and Munich and local divisions in other Member States. However, the UK court may now not open.

According to a statement by patent lawyers Marks & Clerk, “it seems clear that the UK will now not be a part of that project—should it proceed at all”.

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll