header-logo header-logo

27 June 2016
Issue: 7705 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Brexit: London legal hub to "lose ground to Dublin" due to Leave vote

Lawyers are looking to re-register in Ireland so they can continue to practise law in the EU.

Tina Williams, Chair of Fox Williams, says: “Once we leave the EU formally, UK law firms will need to re-establish their right to operate offices and UK lawyers to practise EU law in EU countries.

“Hence the rush by lawyers to become registered on the roll of solicitors in Ireland. We expect to be very busy restructuring law firms and advising lawyers who do not want to be confined to practising solely in England and Wales.

“In the future this could cause London as a hub for professional practices to lose ground to Dublin.”

Lawyers aside, processing a points-based system for the three million EU nationals currently living in the UK would be “a massive burden for the state”, according to Fox Williams partner Sacha Schoenfeld.

“Does it really make sense to subject those currently living and working here to the rigours of a points based system? Three million applications is a huge number for the Home Office to process and a massive burden for the State," she says. 

"Mistakes will be made, resulting in appeals and further cost, as well as further upheaval. To reduce the number of migrants cuts may need to be made to workers with skills and qualifications that are needed currently by UK businesses. 

"Sectors like technology, IT, health, hospitality, manufacturing and agriculture will be hardest hit.”

Issue: 7705 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll