header-logo header-logo

Brexit: is MPs taking control a good or a bad thing?

02 May 2019 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7838 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Michael Zander considers the extremely controversial EU (Withdrawal) (No 5) Bill

  • Many argued that MPs taking control of the legislative process set a dangerous precedent; but is it what the exceptional circumstances of Brexit demanded?

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2019, which started as the European Union (Withdrawal) (No 5) Bill, will surely figure in the next edition of Erskine May: Parliamentary Practice . The Bill was rushed through all its parliamentary stages. Though very unusual, that has happened before. But what was unprecedented was to have a Private Members Bill running to a timetable set by backbenchers that reached the statute book despite the opposition of the government.

No such thing has ever occurred in the more than 100 years since 1902 when the House of Commons Standing Order giving precedence to government business was first established. The House of Lords Constitution Committee’s 2009 report on fast-track legislation did not even mention

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll