header-logo header-logo

The Brexit effect

01 June 2018 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Human rights
printer mail-detail
nlj_7795_parsons

​Simon Parsons considers the future of human rights after Brexit

There are three current sources of human rights in the UK, the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), the Charter of Fundamental Rights (the Charter) and the common law. How will these three sources be affected by Brexit?

The Convention will be unaffected by Brexit because it is administered by the Council of Europe which is separate from the EU. There is also the European Court of Human Rights which decides whether the Convention has been breached. Before 2 October 2000 decisions of the Strasbourg court were only persuasive in UK domestic courts but the Convention was and remains binding on the UK in international law. If UK law is found in breach of the Convention the government is under an obligation under Article 46 to put things right. But politics can get in the way: consider the dragging of feet by consecutive governments after Hirst v UK (No 2) [2005] ECHR 681 where Strasbourg ruled a blanket ban on British prisoners exercising

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll