header-logo header-logo

23 January 2019
Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Brexit: deal or no deal?

Next steps might rebalance UK constitution & its workings forever

Innovation and some constitutional acrobatics could be required if Parliament takes over control of the Brexit process, according to a senior lawyer and Brexit commentator.

MPs have tabled a series of amendments ahead of the vote next week, when Prime Minister Theresa May will renew attempts to persuade the House of Commons to back her withdrawal deal.

They include Labour’s Yvette Cooper and Conservative Nick Boles’s request for a one-day debate on a bill requiring the Prime Minister to seek an Art 50 extension until the end of the year if MPs have not approved a Brexit deal by 26 February.

Former Attorney General Dominic Grieve, meanwhile, has asked for six days of Brexit debate with backbenchers rather than the government in control.

Writing in this week’s NLJ, David Greene, senior partner at Edwin Coe & NLJ consultant editor, says: ‘Parliament is not particularly structured to draft legislation or to drive it through the process, which needs a governmental dynamic.

‘This is not its constitutional role, and it is difficult to see how this will work without innovative machinations of the speaker, whose own role as a neutral may also present constitutional problems.

‘Further, constitutionally the government retains the whip hand, reinforced by Parliament’s own legislation.’

Greene says such moves would ‘turn the legislative process on its head’.

He concludes: ‘Rejection of the prime minister’s proposals has, as she rightly said, put us into uncharted territory constitutionally. Where we go from here might rebalance the UK constitution and its workings forever.’

Meanwhile, the Bar has published its latest Brexit Paper, this time examining how environmental laws will be enforced after Brexit. It is authored by Bar Council EU Law Committee member Celina Colquhoun.

Currently, EU institutions can fine the UK for breaches of EU pollution limits or refer the UK to the European Court of Justice, forcing the government to take action. Post-Brexit, Colquhoun says, the new watchdog proposed by DEFRA, the Office of Environmental Protection, will have far less power.

Issue: 7825 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll