header-logo header-logo

Breaking the code

06 July 2012 / Malcolm Dowden , Emma Humphreys
Issue: 7521 / Categories: Features , Property , Technology
printer mail-detail

Emma Humphreys & Malcolm Dowden dissect the recent Law Commission e-comms code consultation

The Law Commission’s consultation paper based on its initial review of the electronic communications code (the code) makes some substantive proposals for change, but also raises several questions and calls for information from practitioners.

Actual reform remains a distant prospect. There is no realistic chance of change until at least 2015. Consequently, while practitioners ought to take the opportunity to contribute to the reform process, the paper has a more immediate practical use since it isolates points on which the code is unclear and possibly unworkable in its current form. Consequently, it provides practitioners with a crisp and direct means to navigate through the complex drafting and often questionable logic of the code when advising clients on current matters.

Private enterprise, public benefit

The Commission considers that a court order made under the code to dispense with the need for agreement to the installation of electronic communications apparatus must engage human rights issues: specifically, protection of private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Jackson Lees Group—five promotions

Private client division announces five new partners

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Taylor Wessing—Max Millington

Banking and finance team welcomes partner in London

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll