header-logo header-logo

03 February 2012 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7499 / Categories: Features , Local government , Public
printer mail-detail

On borrowed time?

Is the fairytale over for Brent Libraries, asks Nicholas Dobson

Litigation rarely produces a happy outcome for all concerned. And the contention surrounding proposed library closures in Brent is no exception. For, following the dismissal by Ouseley J on 13 October 2011 of challenges to the Council’s decision to close six of its 12 public libraries, the judge’s decision was on 19 December 2011 upheld by the Court of Appeal (R (Bailey & others) v London Borough of Brent Council and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1586, [2011] All ER (D) 193 (Dec)—Pill, Davis and Richards LJJ).

But although Davis LJ, in dismissing the appellants’ appeal, referred to the judge’s “most careful and thorough review of all the points advanced”, the appellants were considerably less impressed, intimating a potential appeal to the Supreme Court.

The statutory and factual background was briefly summarised in my NLJ article of 25 November 2011 (see 161 NLJ 7491, p 1624). The case in particular surrounded the public sector equality duty in s 149 of the Equality Act

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll