header-logo header-logo

19 March 2009
Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Booth to tackle banks

Employment

Employment barrister Cherie Booth QC is to join the legal team fighting a class action against RBS in the US courts.

US law firm Coughlin Stoia has drafted in Booth as a special adviser to pension funds representing local authority workers in North Yorkshire and Merseyside, which claim RBS “falsely reassured” investors that the bank was well-capitalised.

Peter Murphy, partner and litigation specialist at Sackers, the specialist pension law firm, says: “Although public details of the claim are limited at this stage, the historic caution of UK pension funds to become lead plaintiffs in US securities litigation suggests that those involved here are confident of the merits of the claim and have a significant amount at stake.

“The US legal system is an ideal forum for these types of claims. US lawyers act on a ‘no win, no fee’ basis and plaintiffs do not have to pay for the other side’s legal costs even if they lose. It is, of course, also based on US securities’ legislation.

“Cherie Booth’s involvement in the case is surprising. Her profile is mainly in UK and European human rights law, not US securities litigation. But that is not to say she doesn’t have relevant expertise.

“It is simply that she is likely to be just one part of a large legal team bringing with it a variety of skills and knowledge. Her involvement in the case will certainly add greater public interest to an already high-profile media event.”

Issue: 7361 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll