header-logo header-logo

Boosting costs recovery

17 February 2017 / Michelle Barron
Issue: 7734 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Michelle Barron highlights the top eight costs mistakes law firms make, with suggested remedies

The legal sector is unique in the complexity and contentious nature of the calculation and recovery of costs. It is routine for considerable time, effort and frequently litigation to be required to recover costs.

As an experienced costs lawyer, I see common and recurring mistakes, many of which can hamper costs recovery and lead to significant write-offs and adverse costs orders. The impact on cash flow, profitability and resilience in a difficult sector can be immense. But many mistakes are not technical in nature, and can be avoided with minimal time and effort.

1. Delay

Healthy cash flow is the lifeblood of any successful business. The process of costs recovery must be started at the earliest opportunity.

Costs lawyers regularly receive files where there is an entitlement to costs but no action has been taken to recover them. In some cases, several years may have elapsed since the entitlement arose. The reasons for delay vary, but a systematic failure to manage lock-up

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll