header-logo header-logo

02 October 2014
Issue: 7624 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-detail

Boost for equal pay audits

New powers for employment tribunals to order employers to carry out equal pay audits are now in force.

Since 1 October, an order can be made where an employer is found to have breached equal pay law or sexually discriminated in non-contractual pay such as bonuses. The audit results can be made public and employers could face a fine of up to £5,000 for failure to comply with the tribunals’ requests.

According to Simons Muirhead & Burton, new businesses and very small businesses will be exempt from this power, and audits are unlikely to be ordered where they have already occurred in the last three years and there is no reason to think other breaches may have occurred.

Also since 1 October, employers have to grant expectant fathers or the partner of a pregnant woman unpaid time off work to attend up to antenatal classes.

Meanwhile, the national minimum wage hourly rates increase to £6.50 for adults, £5.13 for workers between 18 and 20 years, £3.79 for under-18s and £2.73 for apprentices. Employers who are found to be in breach can incur a financial penalty up to £20,000.

The two-year minimum qualifying period for unfair dismissal is abolished where the application is connected with the employee’s membership of the Reserve Forces. The secretary of state may make payments to compensate small and medium sized employers of reservists who are called to serve.

Emily Chalkley, associate at Charles Russell, said the rule change for reservists was designed to “encourage recruits”, but that “in practice reservists are likely to continue to bring their cases before a reinstatement committee because there are no fees associated with bringing a claim, unlike the employment tribunal who introduced fees earlier this year”.

Issue: 7624 / Categories: Legal News , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll