header-logo header-logo

11 November 2015
Issue: 7676 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

BMA launches its own firm

The British Medical Association (BMA) has launched a ground-breaking legal service to serve the needs of its 160,000-plus members.

BMA Law, which has been granted ABS status, is an independent law firm offering expert, sector specific legal advice. It has been set up with the help of Viv Du-Feu, partner at Cardiff commercial law firm, Capital Law, and director of legal services at the BMA.

Du-Feu says: “The aim of BMA Law is to create a ‘one-stop shop’ for our members. We believe that we are best placed to help with the provision of legal services. We are at the coalface of member issues and therefore understand the concerns facing those operating in the medical profession, feeding back into the political sphere as required.”

The firm will operate on a not-for-profit basis, ploughing any profits back into the BMA.

Andrew Brown, a specialist in commercial disputes and a partner at Capital Law, will lead the BMA Law work at the firm. He said BMA Law would handle lease negotiations, draft documents governing the ownership of practices and conduct dispute resolution, among other services..

Philippa Luscombe, partner at Penningtons Manches, says: “In our experience often those ‘at the coalface’ have concerns or suggestions about systems and patient safety but simply can’t find a way to have their input taken heed of—we have all seen the coverage regarding whistleblowers and how they have been treated.

“For doctors to have somewhere to go to seek advice on situations they are concerned about can only be a good thing. Better support in dealing with their employment conditions and problems when they arise should help to draw attention to system or management failures—again which only benefits patients. Our view therefore is that something like BMA Law could have a real benefit in improving day to day medical care—and in turn reducing avoidable injury and claims.”

Issue: 7676 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll