header-logo header-logo

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

04 February 2026
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Bird & Bird has expanded its London competition law team with the appointment of Emma Radcliffe as a partner. The hire strengthens the firm’s capability in competition collective damages claims and reflects the continued strategic growth of its London competition practice.

Radcliffe specialises in defending competition collective actions before the Competition Appeal Tribunal, as well as related appeals to the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court. She has successfully opposed certification in several recent landmark cases and also advises on complex, multi-jurisdictional competition and regulatory investigations across sectors including music, technology and communications, betting and gaming, and financial services.

She will work closely with the firm’s international dispute resolution team, enhancing Bird & Bird’s litigation strength in mass claims. Phil Sherrell, head of Bird & Bird London, said collective actions are ‘now a major feature of competition enforcement in the UK’ and that Radcliffe’s arrival will ‘enhance our ability to support clients facing these complex and high-value proceedings’.

Peter Willis and Saskia King, partners in the London competition law team, described Radcliffe as ‘a leading competition litigator’, while Radcliffe said she was ‘delighted to be joining Bird & Bird at a time when competition litigation, particularly collective actions, is increasing across sectors’.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
back-to-top-scroll