header-logo header-logo

Best value justice?

21 February 2008 / Steve Hynes
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Features , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

“Goodwill towards the LSC among legal aid firms is probably at an all time low” The LSC is under pressure to deliver change too quickly, says Steve Hynes

Just before Christmas the Legal Services Commission (LSC) produced a consultation paper, Best Value Tendering for Criminal Defence Services. Responses are due by 3 March, with the possibility of a further consultation on the detailed proposals set for later in the year. Many fear that, despite the concerns of practitioners, the LSC will press ahead with best value tendering (BVT) for criminal defence services whatever the results of the consultation, and move to offer the first tenders by next year.

BVT was introduced in April 2000 by the government to replace compulsory competitive tendering (CCT) in local government. The LSC argues that to meet the aims of quality, efficiency among suppliers, and value for money, a BVT system should be introduced for criminal legal aid services. In contrast to local government though, where many local authorities offer tenders to firms and organisations, the criminal
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll