header-logo header-logo

20 June 2013 / James Wilson
Issue: 7565 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Behind the Candelabra, in front of the bench

rexfeatures_1141772pj

James Wilson revisits Liberace’s libel case

Recently competing for the Palme d’Or in Cannes was the new Stephen Soderbergh film Behind the Candelabra, a biopic of the late pianist and entertainer Wladziu Valentino Liberace. The film charts the relationship Liberace had with the much younger Scott Thorson from the mid-1970s to the former’s death in 1987 from an AIDs-related illness.

In 1982 they separated acrimoniously and Thorson brought a lawsuit known in American parlance as “palimony” (equivalent to a matrimonial claim between unmarried couples), which was eventually settled for a small fraction of what had been claimed (Thorson later disowned the litigation). It was certainly not Liberace’s first experience of the law courts: more than two decades earlier, he had brought a case of his own in England which quickly became a cause célèbre.

At that time his star was ascending; it has been claimed he was the highest-paid entertainer in the world for much of the 1950s-70s. His fame was partly based on his talent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll