header-logo header-logo

Bedroom tax

31 July 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

High Court holds controversial tax does not discriminate

The “bedroom tax”—a cut of 14% where a housing benefit claimant has a surplus bedroom—does not unlawfully discriminate against disabled people, the High Court has held. However, Lord Justice Laws criticised the government for not acting sooner to protect disabled children. The case was brought by 10 families. One woman said she had to sleep in a specially adapted bed because of her spina bifida and there was no room for her husband’s bed. Other families said their homes had been specially adapted.

Issue: 7571 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll