header-logo header-logo

Be reasonable

22 May 2008 / Desmond Kilcoyne , Adam Colenso
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Practitioners should prepare carefully before making LTA 1985 dispensation applications, say Adam Colenso and Desmond Kilcoyne

Before a landlord carries out costly works on a building in which there are residential leaseholders, the leaseholders are entitled to be consulted about two matters: first, the nature of the proposed works; and, second, the identity of, and likely cost to be charged by, the contractor to be engaged. However, a landlord can avoid consultation if he obtains a “dispensation” from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT). A landmark decision of the Lands Tribunal now provides guidance as to how such applications for dispensation are to be approached.

The statutory consultation scheme has undergone change in recent years. New ss 20 and 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) were introduced by s 151 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) ss 20/20ZA. Section 20 sets out the consultation requirements with which a landlord must comply by reference to the detailed provisions of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll