header-logo header-logo

22 May 2008 / Desmond Kilcoyne , Adam Colenso
Issue: 7322 / Categories: Features , Public , Landlord&tenant , Property
printer mail-detail

Be reasonable

Practitioners should prepare carefully before making LTA 1985 dispensation applications, say Adam Colenso and Desmond Kilcoyne

Before a landlord carries out costly works on a building in which there are residential leaseholders, the leaseholders are entitled to be consulted about two matters: first, the nature of the proposed works; and, second, the identity of, and likely cost to be charged by, the contractor to be engaged. However, a landlord can avoid consultation if he obtains a “dispensation” from the Leasehold Valuation Tribunal (LVT). A landmark decision of the Lands Tribunal now provides guidance as to how such applications for dispensation are to be approached.

The statutory consultation scheme has undergone change in recent years. New ss 20 and 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (LTA 1985) were introduced by s 151 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 (CLRA 2002) ss 20/20ZA. Section 20 sets out the consultation requirements with which a landlord must comply by reference to the detailed provisions of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll