header-logo header-logo

Debarring orders: Be careful what you wish for?

05 December 2025 / Mary Young
Issue: 8142 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Fraud
printer mail-detail
237724
Debarment: shortcut to judgment or simply a trial management tool? Mary Young reports
  • Debarment can be used to accelerate determination of a claim at a lower cost to the claimant, and it can be extremely effective. But in some circumstances, the issues relating to the extent of a defendant’s participation in a trial may be more nuanced.
  • Even where a defendant has been debarred, residual discretion and the exercise of the court’s judicial function tend to lead to a limited degree of participation being allowed by the court.

‘A debarring order is an important sanction available to the court in the exercise of its case management powers, and an important method of ensuring that the court’s case management orders are respected.’ So summarised Mr Edwin Johnson KC, sitting as a deputy judge in Times Travel (UK) Ltd v Pakistan International Airlines Corp [2019] EWHC 3732 (Ch).

Obtaining an unless order with a view to debarring a defendant from defending the claim is a tactic employed, when

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll