header-logo header-logo

26 November 2009
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Barristers approved to form LDPs

Solicitors & barristers allowed to form businesses, after extensive consulation

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) has given its approval for barristers to supply legal services through legal disciplinary practices (LDPs).

The decision which paves the way for barristers to set up in business with solicitors, and follows extensive work by a BSB working group, including three consultations on the possible impact of the Legal Services Act 2007.

Nicholas Green QC, the chairman-elect of the Bar Council, says: “The BSB’s decision represent an historic moment for the Bar.”

The BSB emphasised, in a statement released last week, that it did not want to lose the “unique attributes” of the Bar, including the cab-rank rule, independence of thought and collegiality through membership of the profession and the Inns of Court.

The board adopted a number of recommendations regarding LDPs:
l barristers should be permitted to become managers of LDPs which include up to 25% non-lawyer managers;
l barristers should be permitted to practise as both managers and as independent practitioners, and detailed guidance will be developed relating to this;
l barristers should be discouraged from becoming shareholders in LDPs due to possible conflict of interest issues, until further guidance is issued;
l barristers should be permitted to form barrister-only partnerships (BoPs) pending the creation of an appropriate regulator for such entities;
l barristers should be permitted in principle to practise through other barrister-only companies and limited liability partnerships; and
l the cab-rank rule will apply to barrister-only partnerships, and the BSB considers that all advocates should be subject to the cab-rank rule and will be raising this with other regulators.

The recommendations will take effect once they have been approved by the Ministry of Justice and the Legal Services Board.

Baroness Deech, chairman of the BSB, says: “[This] will send a shot of adrenaline through the profession.

“Our decisions on LDPs reflect the need to develop and enhance the supply of legal services so as to best serve clients of the Bar and guarantee access to justice.

"In relation to shareholding in LDPs, we discourage this until we are confident that proper clarification and guidance is in place about conflicts. In relation to dual practice, we hope to provide flexibility in the provision of barristers’ services to the benefit of both practitioners  and consumers."
 

Issue: 7395 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll