header-logo header-logo

Bar standards

03 July 2008
Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

In brief

The cost of regulating barristers rose by nearly 10% in one year, according to the Bar Standards Board (BSB)’s annual report. Costs rose from £3.6m in 2006 to £3.9m in 2007— partly due to the BSB hiring an extra seven staff and improving its IT provision. The number of barristers called to the Bar rose from 794 in 2006 to 906 in 2007. Last year, the BSB conducted research into the public’s view of barristers, set out its reforms for complaints handling and launched a review of the Bar Vocational Course. BSB chair Ruth Evans says: “2007 was our second year of operation and one in which we put in train a programme of work to ensure the core building blocks of professional regulation—training and education, the Code of Conduct, our complaints and disciplinary system—remain fit for purpose for the modern Bar.”

Issue: 7328 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll