header-logo header-logo

20 March 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Bar exam delays ‘unacceptable’

More than 200 Bar Professional Training Course (BPTC) students have signed a letter criticising the regulator for its handling of delays to barrister exams in response to COVID-19

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) announced this week it will delay the three Central Examination Board assessments in civil litigation, criminal litigation and profession ethics until August but would keep this ‘under review as the situation develops’.

However, the students say sitting the exam in August may be impossible for some international students, due to continued lockdown in their home countries. Those due to begin pupillage in the autumn will have to sit the exams during pupillage, and will have no opportunity to resit. Moreover, it will be unsafe, even in August, for some students with underlying health conditions to sit exams.

The letter, to BSB director general Mark Neale, the Director General of the Bar Standards Board (BSB), describes the current proposal as ‘inadequate’. It acknowledges the terrible impact Covid-19 is having on people’s lives and emphasises that the students don’t want to prioritise their concerns over those of others but to urge the BSB ‘to make reasonable adjustments to mitigate them’ where it can.

However, the students argue: ‘it is clear that it is the format of the exams, not their timing, which must be changed… there are other solutions which could be adopted.’ They suggest options such as using software to ensure exam entrants adhere to time limits, making the exams ‘open book’ and asking applicants to sign a declaration.

The letter, which sets out the reasons why the current arrangement is problematic, can be viewed here.

A BSB spokesperson said: ‘We are very conscious that this is an uncertain and worrying time for students but, at the current time, we have nothing further to add to the statement which we published earlier in the week.’

 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll