header-logo header-logo

06 June 2017
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bar Council leaders

The Bar Council has welcomed two new faces to its leadership team.

New Chief Executive Malcolm Cree will replace Stephen Crowne, who is retiring, in August. Cree previously worked as Principal Consultant at strategy consultancy Catalyze, where he specialised in strategy and decision analysis. Prior to that, he served in the Royal Navy for 35 years, reaching the rank of Rear Admiral. 

Andrew Langdon QC, Chair of the Bar, said: ‘He joins us at a time when we are reviewing the future direction of the organisation and meeting the challenges and opportunities the profession faces.’

Meanwhile, criminal law barrister Richard Atkins QC, of St Philips Chambers. has been named as next year's Vice-Chair of the Bar. Andrew Walker QC, the current Vice-Chair, will become Chair on 1 January 2018. 

Atkins practices in crime and regulatory law and in the VAT tribunal. He was called to the Bar in 1989 and took silk in 2011. He has been a Recorder since 2005 and a Mental Health Tribunal Judge since 2014. He is Leader of the Midland Circuit and a Legal Chair for the Financial Reporting Council Disciplinary Tribunal.

Walker, of Maitland Chambers, was called to the Bar in 1991 and took silk in 2011. His practice focuses on property, company and commercial disputes and professional negligence claims. He was awarded the Bar Pro Bono Award in 2009 for some of his work with the homelessness charity, Shelter.

Lorinda Long will continue as Treasurer of the Bar Council for the fourth year. She joined Bank of America Merrill Lynch in 2016, having previously worked as an in-house lawyer, head of legal and general counsel at NatWest, Credit Suisse, Bank of Scotland and Lloyds. 

Issue: 7749 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll