header-logo header-logo

Banks, lenders & the doctrine of purview

06 September 2024 / Jonathan Bennett , James Davies
Issue: 8084 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Banking
printer mail-detail
188090
James Davies & Jonathan Bennett delve into this intricate & often misunderstood legal principle—as well as its impact on lenders
  • The doctrine of purview, a nuanced legal principle in the law of guarantees, plays a critical role in enforcement attempts against debtors, particularly guarantors, under a mortgage.
  • This article examines key decisions by the English courts, the doctrine’s limits, and its practical implications for lenders.
  • It explores the doctrine’s potential as a line of defence in summary judgment applications and bankruptcy proceedings, and offers strategies for lenders to mitigate risks.

There is a legal principle known as the ‘doctrine of the purview’ in the law of guarantees, and it can have an effect on enforcement attempts against debtors (principally any guarantors) under a mortgage. Therefore, for banks and other lenders, and their advisors, it is a doctrine that they should at least be aware of—and in certain circumstances should consider carefully.

While there are several key decisions by the English courts in which the doctrine

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll