header-logo header-logo

10 March 2011
Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Bankruptcy annulled

The High Court has annulled the bankruptcy of a woman who lacked capacity and ruled that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) breached its duties under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995 (DDA 1995).

Nicola Haworth suffered physical injuries in an accident and suffered from chronic mental illness, including a phobia of opening mail. She bred horses as a non-money-making hobby. Following a tip-off that she was running a commercial enterprise, HMRC wrote to request tax returns and, when they did not receive any, assessed Ms Haworth as owing over £192,000 in tax.

Her benefits were stopped, she lost her horses, and HMRC obtained a bankruptcy order against her. In 2007, Ms Haworth’s mother had written to HMRC, explaining the situation.

The court held that HMRC failed to make reasonable adjustments as required under the DDA 1995 and it could have considered alternative enforcement methods, or made further contact with Ms Haworth’s mother.

Rachel Sleeman, of Five Paper, who represented Ms Haworth, says: “Public authorities should ensure they are aware of their duties under the DDA and the Equality Act 2010 when they take steps to make someone bankrupt, and must reasonably adjust their practices, policies and procedures accordingly.”
 

Issue: 7456 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll