header-logo header-logo

Bankruptcy

09 June 2017
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Oraki and another v Bramston and another [2017] EWCA Civ 403, [2017] All ER (D) 174 (May)

The Court of Appeal dismissed the claimants’ appeal against the judge’s decision, dismissing their claims against the defendant trustees in bankruptcy for breach of duty, in particular, by prolonging the administration of the bankruptcy and frustrating attempts to annul them. It had not been open to the defendants to bring the bankruptcies to an end by the use of cash resources and they had not actively opposed the applications for the annulment of the bankruptcies.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Commercial leasehold, the defence of insanity and ‘consent’ in the criminal law are among the next tranche of projects for the Law Commission
Tech companies will be legally required to prevent material that encourages or assists serious self-harm appearing on their platforms, under Online Safety Act 2023 regulations due to come into force in the autumn
The Bar has a culture of ‘impunity’ and ‘collusive bystanding’ in which making a complaint is deemed career-ending due to a ‘cohort of untouchables’ at the top, Baroness Harriet Harman KC has found
Lawyers have broadly welcomed plans to electronically tag up to 22,000 more offenders, scrap most prison terms below a year and make prisoners ‘earn’ early release
The ex-wife of a Russian billionaire has won her bid to bring her financial relief claim in London, in a unanimous Court of Appeal decision
back-to-top-scroll