header-logo header-logo

Banking on experts

03 June 2016 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7701 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Donna Goldsworthy & Andrew Kasapis consider the role of an expert in commercial litigation & banking case

Some cases are won or lost on the strength of expert evidence. Under the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Pt 35.1, the courts now have a duty to restrict expert evidence to “that which is reasonably required to resolve the proceedings”. The court has to make a judgment on how cogent the expert evidence will be; how helpful it will be in resolving issues and how much it will cost and the relativity of the sums at stake. Guidance for the Instruction of Experts in Civil Claims, published by the Civil Justice Council also focuses on costs and proportionality. The court’s permission is required to call oral expert evidence.

Some litigators find it helpful to consult a “behind the scenes” expert at an early stage of a case, particularly when a matter is complex. An expert adviser can assist through clarification and explanation of technical and commercial issues, and in other areas such as scoping for disclosure. Clients

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll