header-logo header-logo

Bangle Dilemma

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News In Brief

A 14-year-old girl who was excluded from her school for wearing a Sikh religious bangle is this week taking her case to the High Court. Sarika Singh has been excluded from the school in South Wales since 5 November 2007, when she refused to remove the bangle. The school’s uniform policy bans the wearing of any jewellery other than a wrist watch and plain ear studs. Singh will argue that Aberdare Girls’ School breached the Race Relations Act 1976, the Equality Act 2006, and the Human Rights Act 1998, as well as a 25-year-old law lords’ decision allowing Sikh children to wear items representing their faith, including turbans, to school.

Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll