header-logo header-logo

26 June 2019
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Balancing the boardroom

Law firms are generally making progress when it comes to boosting the number of women in leadership roles―but some mentoring initiatives may be backfiring.

Only 22% of equity partners at law firms are women, compared to 61% of trainees. Research by Thomson Reuters and Acritas, published this week, identified some successful initiatives: for example, 69% of firms have a board level representative who focuses on diversity, and 60% of firms have voluntarily added partners into their gender pay gap reporting.

The research, ‘Transforming women’s leadership in the law’, was conducted with 48 leading UK and European law firms. Nearly half (46%) the firms include a representative gender balance in all pitches to potential clients; 30% ensure a representative gender balance on all client teams; and 42% ensure slates of candidates up for promotion are gender balanced.

It identified three themes vital to success: make gender diversity a strategic goal and pursue it by setting targets, tracking progress and appointing a board representative; ensure female lawyers get sufficient client exposure and access to a wide range of work; and reconsider ‘women-only’ initiatives and check mentors are giving the right advice.

Interestingly, the researchers found that some initiatives correlate with less success: for example, women-only networks did not improve progress whereas opening those networks up to include men had a more positive impact. Similarly, the research suggested advice given by mentors can sometimes put women off the partnership track rather than provide encouragement.

Lisa Hart Shepherd, CEO of Acritas, said: ‘The research has delivered some surprising insights that are consistent with broader diversity research which suggests some diversity programs have a negative effect.

‘It is important for firms to take a step back and review their portfolio of initiatives and check that they are working holistically to positive effect in their current form.’

Last week, the Law Society, Bar Council, The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives, firms and chambers launched a Women in Law pledge, promising to support the promotion of women into senior roles, to set an action plan and targets, and to publicly report on progress.

The Law Society also published its ‘International Women in Law’ report, a global study on female lawyers across the globe. It identified unequal remuneration, a lack of flexible working and traditional gender roles and stereotypes as some of the key challenges faced by female lawyers.

Law Society president Christina Blacklaws said the research found ‘significant barriers to progression’. 

Issue: 7846 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll