header-logo header-logo

Awarding costs: Being held to account

22 October 2020 / HHJ Karen Walden-Smith
Issue: 7907 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
30002
When awarding costs on account, what is a reasonable sum, asks HHJ Karen Walden-Smith

In brief

  • A change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs.
  • A specific, and very important, area of costs awards which has recently been engaging greater attention of the courts is the award of a payment on account of costs pursuant to the provisions of rule 44.2(8). CPR 44.2(8).

One of the major abiding features of the Civil Procedure Rules has been the change in the way in which costs are to be awarded and the exercise of the court’s discretion in the award of those costs. The general rule that the unsuccessful party will be ordered to pay the costs of the successful party (CPR 44.2 (2)(a)) has been significantly adjusted to allow the court a much greater discretion in order to give proper weight to issues of conduct, both before and during the proceedings; whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll