header-logo header-logo

25 April 2013 / Frank Maher
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Opinion , Risk management , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Avoiding the Balva trap

istock_000022969802xlarge

Was Balva an accident waiting to happen, asks Frank Maher

Balva—a name which will cause trepidation among members of the 1,300 law firms—one in eight of the profession—who insured with them.

There is no suggestion that they are insolvent. But then equally, what reassurance is available? The unaudited fourth quarter accounts for 2012 will not, on their own (if at all), provide that assurance.

As the English section of Balva’s website states: “Activities of Balva have not stayed unnoticed by international professional organisations.” The Financial Conduct Authority register notes: “The Latvian regulator has prohibited this firm from writing any new business in the UK, effective 1 March 2013.” It is not clear when this note was added, but it first appears to have come to the attention of the press around 12 April 2013, a worrying time lapse.

A secure future?

Now, it is entirely possible that the measures taken by the Latvian authorities will secure Balva’s future, but it will require a degree of faith from policyholders to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll