header-logo header-logo

Avoiding the Balva trap

25 April 2013 / Frank Maher
Issue: 7557 / Categories: Opinion , Risk management , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
istock_000022969802xlarge

Was Balva an accident waiting to happen, asks Frank Maher

Balva—a name which will cause trepidation among members of the 1,300 law firms—one in eight of the profession—who insured with them.

There is no suggestion that they are insolvent. But then equally, what reassurance is available? The unaudited fourth quarter accounts for 2012 will not, on their own (if at all), provide that assurance.

As the English section of Balva’s website states: “Activities of Balva have not stayed unnoticed by international professional organisations.” The Financial Conduct Authority register notes: “The Latvian regulator has prohibited this firm from writing any new business in the UK, effective 1 March 2013.” It is not clear when this note was added, but it first appears to have come to the attention of the press around 12 April 2013, a worrying time lapse.

A secure future?

Now, it is entirely possible that the measures taken by the Latvian authorities will secure Balva’s future, but it will require a degree of faith from policyholders to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll