header-logo header-logo

Auxiliary matters & making adjustments

24 September 2021 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7949 / Categories: Features , Employment , Equality
printer mail-detail
58610
Auxiliary aids in adjustments claims: Charles Pigott looks at a less frequently used aspect of the Equality Act
  • The EAT has said that it is ‘all too common’ for auxiliary aids to be overlooked when assessing disability discrimination claims.
  • The breadth of this element of the reasonable adjustments regime was recently demonstrated in judicial review proceedings against the government.

The duty to make adjustments is defined in s 20, Equality Act 2010, and applied across a number of different parts of the Act, including Part 3 (services and public functions) and Part 5 (work). Section 20(2) provides that the duty comprises three requirements, which are defined in sub-sections (3) to (5).

The first two requirements, triggered by the application of a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) and the physical features of premises respectively, are more familiar. However, the third requirement is not encountered so frequently, at least in employment case law.

The third requirement applies where a disabled person ‘would, but for the provision of an auxiliary aid,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll