header-logo header-logo

Arrested development

04 November 2010
Issue: 7440 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-detail

European Court ruling could allow prisoners to vote

Prisoners could be given the right to vote—six years after the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled that a blanket ban was unlawful.

The Cabinet Office revealed this week that the government may act to implement the ruling, Hirst v UK (No. 2) (App no 74025/01), which was made in a case brought by former prisoner John Hirst.

In June, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe urged the UK to act on the issue. The Committee is due to meet again at the end of November.

A Cabinet Office spokesperson said: “The government has been actively considering this issue over the summer.

“This work is continuing. There are a number of court cases underway on the issue that the government wants to take into account as part of our ongoing consideration.”

Simon Creighton, partner at Bhatt Murphy Solicitors, who specialises in prison law, says: “The government has been absolutely disgraceful on this because the European ruling said that the UK was required to put in place a policy on this, not that all prisoners be enfranchised, so sitting on this for five years is just mind boggling in its negligence.

“What the UK was required to do was put forward a rational basis for the loss of the right to vote, for example, that those serving more than ten years in prison should lose the right to vote because the seriousness of their offending has an impact on their citizenship, or that those convicted of election fraud should lose the right to vote.

“Personally, I believe there is no convincing argument for the deprivation of the right to vote. It can encourage prisoners to have a stake in society.”

Juliet Lyons, director of Prison Reform Trust, says it was regrettable that the government had waited so long.

“The punishment is deprivation of liberty, and the emphasis should be on rehabilitation. Prison governors and chief inspectors of prisons have supported giving prisoners the vote because they see it as a way for them to exercise responsibility. Those on remand already vote, and a comparatively simple mechanism of postal voting could be used to introduce this for the rest.”

Issue: 7440 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll