header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

Appeal court clears air on community design rights

News

The first ruling on the scope of the Registered Community Design Right  (CDR) has been handed down by the Court of Appeal.

Bird & Bird, which acted for Reckitt Benckiser in its high-profile dispute with Procter & Gamble says the case has major significance for designers and brands worldwide.

Bird & Bird partner, Lorna Brazell, says the case is groundbreaking as this is the first authoritative guidance on the CDR and has also set an important precedent in Europe, clarifying for the first time what constitutes the protection available to an original design.

In February 2006, Procter & Gamble sued Reckitt Benckiser over the design of the container of its air freshener Air Wick Odour Stop, claiming it infringed the Registered Community Design which it had obtained for its Febreze product.

The High Court ruled in favour of Procter & Gamble, finding that the two designs were too similar, but the appeal court this week overruled this decision asserting that  there was sufficient difference of detail between them. 

Brazell says the decision is important for all brand owners and all those involved in consumer product industries where the use of designs is paramount.

“We now have clear guidance on what protection an original design can attract and significantly a systematic approach to get there.”

Issue: 7293 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll