header-logo header-logo

19 April 2024
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

AlphaBiolabs advise the MOCCA test (plus 15% off all tests for NLJ readers)

Ever wondered about the reasoning behind the MOCCA and MOCCA-B drug tests frequently sought by family law professionals, social workers and local authorities?

Lawyers are often advised to order these particular tests—but why?

‘We routinely test for a wide variety of drugs and their metabolites (breakdown products),’ says Marie Law, head of toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, a UKAS-accredited laboratory with over 20 years’ experience in drug testing for legal matters.

‘Yet of all the substances we test for at our laboratory, there are a handful, known by the acronyms of MOCCA and MOCCA-B, that show up time and time again in legal drug test results. They are also widely recognised as some of the most misused substances in the UK.’

MOCCA is an acronym standing for methamphetamine, opiates (including heroin), cocaine (including crack cocaine), cannabis and amphetamines.  

MOCCA-B encompasses all of these, and adds benzodiazepines.

AlphaBiolabs tends to advise its customers to test for the MOCCA or MOCCA-B range for several reasons.

First of all, as Law explains, ‘testing for these substances together can provide clarity in circumstances where it is unclear which substance(s) an individual may have used.

‘This is crucial where important safeguarding decisions need to be made, such as in child welfare cases.’

Secondly, Law says: ‘Testing for a wide range of drugs means that the appropriate treatment and rehabilitation plans can be put in place, in line with the substances that have been used.’

Thirdly, Law says: ‘Street drugs are often “cut” with a variety of substances to create or enhance the desired effect of the high, without the knowledge of the person purchasing and consuming the drugs.

‘This means that a comprehensive drug test might find “unexpected” substances in the donor’s sample that may not have been disclosed at the time samples were collected.’

AlphaBiolabs is offering legal clients 15% off its drug testing until 30 June 2024. Simply cite DRUG15 when requesting your quote.

It also promises rapid results with sample collections from any location within 24 to 48 hours of instruction, a wide range of testing including hair, nail, urine and oral fluid samples, and free legally instructed sample collections at its nationwide walk-in centres.

Find out more at alphabiolabs.co.uk, email testing@alphabiolabs.com or call 0333 600 1300. 
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll