header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

All Hallows Brexit unlikely

Ratification of Withdrawal Agreement Bill put on hold… for now 

EU leaders have indicated a Brexit extension will be granted, following the latest defeat for the government.

MPs voted 329-299 to move the prime minister’s withdrawal agreement bill to the second reading stage, where a number of amendments are likely to be sought, including membership of a customs deal and putting the agreement to the public in a remain versus withdrawal agreement referendum.

Following this victory, however, the prime minister’s hopes of a Halloween Brexit were all but dashed within the hour when MPs rejected by 322-308 votes his accelerated timetable to push the 110-page Bill through Parliament within three days. Prime Minister Johnson immediately paused the Bill, reneging on an earlier threat to abandon it altogether.

Donald Tusk, president of the European Commission, later that evening indicated an extension to the Art 50 process would be granted, tweeting: ‘Following PM @BorisJohnson’s decision to pause the process of ratification of the Withdrawal Agreement, and in order to avoid a no-deal #Brexit, I will recommend the EU27 accept the UK request for an extension. For this I will propose a written procedure.’

The prime minister had previously requested an extension to 31 January 2020, in compliance with the Benn Act (European Union (Withdrawal) (No. 2) Act 2019).

Simon Parsons, formerly associate professor of law at Solent University, said the second reading of the withdrawal agreement bill would be ‘a historic moment in the Brexit saga’ and Boris Johnson ‘will now be able to say in the inevitable general election campaign that he has the right deal for the country’.

However, Sir Keir Starmer, shadow Brexit secretary, said the proposed withdrawal agreement, which only runs until the end of 2020, contains a ‘trapdoor’ to a no-deal Brexit.

Moreover, the prime minister has lost the support of the Democratic Unionist Party due to the agreement’s ‘border in the Irish sea’ and the revelation that Northern Ireland businesses will have to fill out export declaration forms when sending goods to Great Britain.

A general election could be called if two-thirds of MPs agree or if a vote of no confidence is passed and opposition MPs are unable to form an alternative government within two weeks.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll