header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010 / Malcolm Dowden , Saira Malik
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Features , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Age of prohibition

Competition law prohibition is to extend to land agreements, says Malcolm Dowden & Saira Malik

The Land Agreements Exclusion and Revocation Order 2004, which excluded land agreements from the operation of the Competition Act 1998, has been revoked subject to a transitional period up to 6 April 2011 to allow businesses to review their land agreements for compliance with competition laws.

The exclusion for land agreements.

The 1998 Act prohibits:
 

  • anti-competitive agreements (Ch 1); and
  • abuse of a dominant market position (Ch 2).

Agreements were excluded from the Ch 1 prohibition to the extent that they create, alter, transfer or terminate an interest in land on the grounds that they were unlikely to have an adverse effect on competition.

However, the Competition Commission’s April 2008 report on grocery retailing concluded that exclusivity arrangements and restrictive covenants (especially by the major grocery retailers) can create:

  • challenges for new entrants; and
  • difficulties for existing competitors intending to expand.

It concluded that the exclusion for land agreements entered into by those major grocery

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll