header-logo header-logo

AG under spotlight

11 January 2007
Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

In brief

The Constitutional Affairs Committee has decided to inquire into the constitutional position of the Attorney General—Lord Goldsmith—after the decision to abandon the Serious Fraud Office inquiry into alleged corruption in BAE Systems’ arms deal with Saudi Arabia. Alan Beith, who chairs the influential committee, says the inquiry will examine the functions of the Attorney General vis-à-vis his role as superintending minister for legal services provided in government, including the Crown Prosecution Service, and will consider whether this role conflicts with his duties as a member of the government. “In the light of recent events where the [Lord Goldsmith] has had to make decisions about highly political subjects involving prosecutions, the constitutional role of the Attorney General as part of the framework of upholding the rule of law has taken on an unusual importance,” Beith adds.

Issue: 7255 / Categories: Legal News , Constitutional law
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll