header-logo header-logo

27 October 2021
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-detail

Affirmative cyber cover

An extra clause addressing affirmative cyber cover is to be added to the minimum terms and conditions for professional indemnity insurance, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has announced

The clause has been submitted to the Legal Services Board for final approval. If agreed, it will be in place for insurance renewals from early 2022 onwards.

It means insurance policies will explicitly state whether cover for cybercrime is available and specify what losses fall within scope for a potential claim. The cover is for client and third-party protection.

Losses to the law firm (first-party losses) are not covered, except for certain costs of investigating and defending a claim. However, firms can purchase a separate cyber policy for other risks.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘Law firms handle large amounts of client money and sensitive information, and that makes them an attractive target to cybercriminals.

‘The clause on cyber losses provides real clarity for consumers, law firms and insurers about client and third-party protection in the event of cyber-attack, without changing the amount of cover specified by the minimum terms and conditions.’

The SRA published its 2021-22 business plan last week, following a consultation exercise in which more than 8,000 people voiced their opinions. Key areas of work for the SRA in the coming year, starting in November, include delivering the new Solicitors Qualifying Examination, building partnerships in lawtech, increasing its focus on anti-money laundering, developing its presence in Wales, and researching factors underpinning the attainment gap and over-representation of black and ethnic minority solicitors within enforcement processes.

Responding to feedback to its consultation, the SRA has also added: explaining its approach to assuring advocacy standards, capturing information on its legal service unbundling pilot, continuing to tackle cybercrime and confirming its commitment to considering environmental and climate issues through its work.

Issue: 7954 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Cyber
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll