header-logo header-logo

22 October 2024
Issue: 8091 / Categories: Legal News , Animal welfare
printer mail-detail

Action on animal cruelty tourism

Progress is being made on banning adverts and sale of unethical holiday activities abroad such as swimming with dolphins and playing football with elephants

The Animals (Low-Welfare Activities Abroad) Act 2023 bans the ‘sale, offering for sale, or advertisement in England and Northern Ireland of low-welfare animal activities which take place abroad’. Once implemented, it would ban British adverts for practices involving animals abroad that would be illegal here.

While the Act came into force in September 2023, it has not yet been implemented.

In September, in response to a written question, environment, food and rural affairs minister Daniel Zeichner MP said the government would ‘introduce the most ambitious programme for animal welfare in a generation... and will be setting out next steps in due course’.

Last week, the Low-Welfare Act Coalition of animal protection organisations, led by Duncan McNair, chief executive of Save the Asian Elephants, met with ministers about next steps in implementation of the Act. 

McNair said the meeting ‘was broadly positive’. 

‘The minister, Baroness Hayman, emphasised government’s determination to get the regulations in place and to implement this most important of all animal protection laws. On behalf of the Low-Welfare Act Coalition I have requested a statement from government which we hope will clarify this week exactly what steps they intend and when and what more they expect of us to ensure prompt action and enforcement.

‘The Coalition I lead has already provided abundant evidence to our government of the heart-breaking cruelty being inflicted on most of the world’s iconic species in the name of tourism “fun” and profits. Without change few will survive beyond the end of this century.

‘It is important to the Coalition that the intense lobbying against change of those who seek to defend this cruel exploitation does not prevail,’ he said.  

The Act enjoys majority support among the British public. An independent survey this month by polling company Find Out Now among more than 2,000 Britons found 79% in favour of the Act, while 55% regarded implementation as a ‘high’ or ‘very high’ priority.

Save the Asian Elephants reports that elephants used in tourism are taken from the wild when young and trained into obedience so as to be safe near tourists. This involves isolation, deprivation of food, water and sleep, and beating and stabbing with rods, chains and bullhooks. This treatment sometimes results in death.

The charity highlights that other endangered species can also suffer and die in tourism such as monkeys, lions, tigers, bears and dolphins, and humans can die or be injured by captive wild animals.

Supporters say it gives entertainment to tourists, creates jobs for locals, and that western countries shouldn't impose their values and culture on others. About 1,200 UK companies currently advertise some 300 or more venues abroad where such treatment happens to elephants.

 

Issue: 8091 / Categories: Legal News , Animal welfare
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll