header-logo header-logo

31 January 2019 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7826 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

A matter of time

There is no limitation period in English criminal law in respect of serious criminal offences. Alec Samuels reports
  • Limitation periods and prosecuting after long delays.

Alimitation period, eg 12 years, is common in continental countries. The arguments against allowing a prosecution after delay, especially long delay, have arisen in the context of alleged offences by British soldiers in Northern Ireland at ‘Bloody Sunday’ in 1972, and in the case of alleged offences of historic sex, eg Field Marshal Lord Bramall, Lord Brittan QC, Lord Janner QC, Mr Paul Gambaccini, Mr Harvey Proctor, and Sir Cliff Richard, none of whom (apart from Lord Janner) has ever been charged.

The defence will claim prejudice, the impossibility of a fair trial. Memories will have faded; witnesses will be unreliable, or untraceable, or dead; no DNA evidence will be available; no records; no photographs; and corroboration is not legally required. D will be seriously handicapped in conducting a defence. The trial will become ‘his word against mine’. D will in effect have to prove his innocence. The credibility

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll