header-logo header-logo

16 September 2020 / Amy Proferes
Issue: 7902 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

A long lease breach? Be specific!

27508
What happens when neighbours claim your tenants run a brothel? Amy Proferes looks at a recent case
  • Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace looks at leaseholder’s responsibility for tenant’s illegal activities.
  • Where brothel-running is alleged, the leaseholder (lessee) should take prompt action.
  • The landlord’s notice should be specific.


A landlord wishing to forfeit a long lease of residential premises faces a daunting procedural labyrinth. The usual statutory notice under s 146 of the Law of Property Act 1925 must be served, specifying the breach complained of but, pursuant to s 168 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002, this may only be done if either the lessee has admitted the breach or 14 days have elapsed since a court or tribunal has finally determined that the breach occurred. The recent decision in Marchitelli v 15 Westgate Terrace Ltd [2020] UKUT 192 (LC) shows that, even if an application for determination is successful, the landlord may still not be in a position to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll