header-logo header-logo

12 February 2016
Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

86 courts & tribunals to close

Lawyers lament announcement of planned closure of 86 courts by MoJ

The government’s decision to close 86 courts and tribunals is a sign that “the days of the local county court are gone”.

Last week, the Ministry of Justice announced that it would shut all but five of 91 courts and tribunals originally earmarked for closure. The five are Bath, Carmarthen, St Helens, Stockport and West Cumbria. Some 64 of the sites will close as proposed in the consultation on the closures last July, and alternative venues may be found for the remaining 22.

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and senior partner at Edwin Coe, laments the decision as “further distancing individuals geographically from the civil justice process”.

However, he adds: “We should not, of course, tie ourselves to the delivery of civil justice within the old framework.

“Old-style establishments may represent the anachronistic ‘majesté’ of the law but can be places of alienation from the law. Civil justice can be delivered in different ways and the Briggs proposals for online courts may be a step towards that end.

“The problem in the short term is that there is no replacement for the courts that are closing; the cart that is court closures seems to have jumped ahead of the horse that is the Briggs proposals.”

Last month, Lord Briggs proposed that civil disputes valued at less than £25,000 could be dealt with by an online court, in his interim report on civil justice.

In a statement to Parliament last week, Justice minister Shailesh Vara said the government is investing £700m over the next four years in IT systems, modern technology and building updates. He said nearly half of all courts and tribunals are empty for half their available hearing time.

“Court closures are difficult decisions; local communities have strong allegiances to their local courts and I understand their concerns,” Vara said.

“But changes to the estate are vital if we are to modernise a system which everybody accepts is unwieldy, inefficient, slow, expensive to maintain and unduly bureaucratic.”

Family lawyers' group Resolution say the proposed closures are “devastating”, particularly for “victims of domestic abuse, young people and those who rely on public transport to get around”.

Issue: 7687 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll