header-logo header-logo

65 AND OUT

06 September 2007
Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

In brief

The Heyday ageism case which challenges mandatory retirement ages has been referred to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for a preliminary ruling. The High Court has referred five questions to the ECJ which address whether parts of the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 (SI 2006/2408) properly implement the EU Equal Treatment Directive 76/207/EC. Heyday and Age Concern believe the new rules breach the Directive because they leave people over 65 without the right to choose to continue to work and enable employers to refuse to recruit anyone over the age of 65.

Issue: 7287 / Categories: Legal News , EU , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Hugh James—Phil Edwards

Serious injury teambolstered by high-profile partner hire

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Freeths—Melanie Stancliffe

Firm strengthens employment team with partner hire

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

DAC Beachcroft—Tim Barr

Lawyers’ liability practice strengthened with partner appointment in London

NEWS
Ceri Morgan, knowledge counsel at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer LLP, analyses the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd, which reshapes the law of fiduciary relationships and common law bribery
The boundaries of media access in family law are scrutinised by Nicholas Dobson in NLJ this week
Reflecting on personal experience, Professor Graham Zellick KC, Senior Master of the Bench and former Reader of the Middle Temple, questions the unchecked power of parliamentary privilege
Geoff Dover, managing director at Heirloom Fair Legal, sets out a blueprint for ethical litigation funding in the wake of high-profile law firm collapses
James Grice, head of innovation and AI at Lawfront, explores how artificial intelligence is transforming the legal sector
back-to-top-scroll