header-logo header-logo

40% missing from overseas property register

24 May 2023
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-detail
Foreign companies which own UK property may owe fines of almost £1bn for failing to comply with a new law, a solicitor has warned.

Nearly 40% of registered overseas companies which own UK property failed to meet the 31 January deadline to join the Register of Overseas Entities and declare their ultimate owners.

As of 1 February 2023, 12,930 of the 32,440 registered overseas companies had failed to comply, leaving them open to fines of £2,500 per day, a ban on selling their land and possible criminal sanctions for their officers.

The register was set up last August at Companies House, under the Economic Crime (Transparency and Enforcement) Act 2022.

Helen Curtis, corporate partner at Devonshires, said: ‘The register was introduced to disclose who actually owns British property.

‘The intention was to lay bare who is dodging their UK tax obligations. However, the failure to comply rate is shocking.

‘If the 12,930 companies who failed to comply by 31 Jan continued to not comply for the 28 days in February and were fined £2,500 per day, we’re looking at a total amount of £905,100,000– and growing daily.

‘There are more than 50,000 properties across England and Wales held by around 18,000 offshore companies. Of those 18,000 companies, 5,070 were so obtuse with the information they filed that the public still remains in the dark over who ultimately owns and benefits from them.’

In February, business minister Lord Callanan announced increased investigatory powers for Companies House and the Insolvency Service, and up to £20m investment to tackle money laundering by companies that own UK property.

Curtis said: ‘Historically, the UK has been a property hotspot for offshore companies and trusts as it has allowed for a high degree of secrecy for property owners who wish to remain anonymous. However, it has been exploited.’

Issue: 8026 / Categories: Legal News , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll