header-logo header-logo

£200m Mastercard settlement confirmed

26 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Competition , Collective action , Litigation funding , Consumer
printer mail-detail
The Competition Appeals Tribunal (CAT) has approved the £200m settlement between Mastercard and Walter Merricks, in a claim initially valued at £14bn.

Merricks acted as class representative in the opt-out collective proceedings against the bank over multilateral interchange fees charged by Mastercard between 1992 and 2007. The settlement, agreed in December, was challenged by litigation funder Innsworth Capital as too low.

Approving the settlement last week, however, CAT member Hodge Malek KC said: ‘Mr Merricks has tirelessly fought for the benefit of class members over the last eight years and that is appreciated.

‘The fact that the outcome has been disappointing in the light of how the evidence and the rulings had developed does not detract from that.’

Merricks’ solicitor, Boris Bronfentrinker, partner at Willkie Farr & Gallagher, said: ‘These proceedings started off as a landmark case in setting the foundation for collective actions in the UK and it will end being as equally ground-breaking in a settlement achieved under heavy attack and challenge by the litigation funder.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll